Of course, IDCC will appeal. Company supporters hope IDCC can win a favorable settlement — as it did with Samsung.
I don’t see a settlement in the cards. As the world’s largest cellphone maker — and thus the largest royalty target — Nokia has been playing hardball all the way. Of course, in 2008 Nokia settled its war with Qualcomm, on very favorable terms.
My sense is that Nokia places a much greater value on the Qualcomm patent portfolio — or at least considers it impossible to work around all their IP without getting some sort of license.
In the face of a precedent that (if sustained) could begin to destroy its business model, IDCC shares lost 23% of their value on Monday and were essentially flat Tuesday. This seems a little optimistic.
Barron’s reports:
Hilliard Lyons analyst Tom Carpenter maintains his bullish stance on InterDigital despite the setback at the ITC. Carpenter notes that Nokia could still lose on appeal, which could trigger a licensing deal between the two companies. He thinks Nokia could still end up paying IDCC 35 cents per handset, or as much as $300 million over five years.While I understand the large pool of IDCC bulls, I don’t get this, either. I guess it all depends whether you consider this court case a fluke, or representative of the quality of the rest of its patent portfolio.
Even if the company fails to win on appeal, Carpenter contends IDCC’s patent portfolio could make it a potential acquisition target for Research in Motion (RIMM), Cisco (CSCO) or even Nokia. The potential appeal: IDCC holds a large number of patents on LTE, the 4G transmission technology that has been adopted by most wireless carriers.
No comments:
Post a Comment